Would you allow your clients to only peek in the window for a showing?

By
Real Estate Broker Owner with Olsen Ziegler Realty

Would you allow your clients to only peek in the window for a showing?

I can't quite see inside very well...darn...click next!



Absurd question, I know.  But, I use this analogy to drive home the point of the poor image quality with many photos I see of homes for sale in our local MLS here in Greater Cleveland, Ohio and that a buyer looking at photos on the Internet is really a home seller's first showing and a home seller should make a great first impression.

Part of making a first good impression is ensuring photographs are crisp and clear.  Understanding how to achieve this lies in first understanding some basic characteristics of the most commonly used file type that digital cameras store photos as: JPG.

Before I show some examples so you can visually see the difference, it's important for a real estate agent who is taking and processing photos to understand a few basic concepts.  I won't diverge from the post and talk about resolution sizes of thumbnail photos that I also commonly see in the MLS -- you know, the ones you almost need to use a magnifying glass to see or take off your glasses (if you need them) and eyeball the screen up close to see the photo, or other common mistakes such as under exposure, tilted shots, etc.


In order to take, process and produce exceptional photography for real estate, the skill set needed is vast, and the purpose of this post is also to not talk about this as that is really a series of posts, so this post will just touch on a simple concept called "file compression."

JPG or JPEG -- This common acronym is the most common file type for pictures to be displayed on computers, websites, etc.  While this post is not a comprehensive article about JPG, the main point I want to drive home that most REALTORS in my conversations I have found do not understand is that JPG is a lossy compressionLossy meaning "with losses". 

In other words, every time one hits the save button to save the photo being worked on, pixels (the underlying representation of the photo) WILL BE LOST FOREVER.  It is a destructive file compression algorithm.  Other file types are not lossy (such as TIFF), meaning you can edit them, save them twenty times, and you won't lose image quality.

Not so with JPG, each time you make a change and save the file, pixels are lost.

For example, common editing techniques employed by a person with moderate photo editing skills include:

  • resizing
  • straightening
  • histogram editing
  • contrast
  • brightness
  • hue, brightness, saturation
  • shadows
  • highlights
  • resolution reduction for the web (300 dpi to 72 dpi)
  • etc.



The problem is, every time a jpg image is modified in some way, image quality is being degraded with each destructive action.

There is an easy solution to this destructive dilemma, and using Adobe's Photoshop Elements, the answer lies in using a frame layer.

In short, throw your photo into a frame layer as the first step, and the integrity of your photo will be preserved.  Frame layers are built using a technology called Smart Objects.  The smart objects makes changes to a copy of the pixels, not the original photo itself.

What is the resulting impact if you don't use technology to preserve your pixels?  Well...see for yourself.

I don't want to give the impression that JPG is bad.  In fact, depending on implementation, it does a rather remarkable job with maintaining quality given the file size reductions it is capable of achieving.  Moreover, some photo editing programs like Photoshop Elements can do a fabulous job by allowing the user to create "layers" so as to avoid non-destructive behavior to the underlying pixels.

Also note: Not all operations are equally destructive to image quality.  Resizing is one of the worst offenders in my experience.

The 1st photo:  Is the original photo I took with absolutely no edits of any kind applied to it, it is straight out of the camera. 

Original Unedited Photo



The 2nd photo: I took the original photo, created a Photoshop Elements frame layer, and then re-sized it up and down about 10 times, re-sampling the pixels like crazy. You can see the end result is almost identical if not identical to the first photo.

Using a Frame Layer - Edited 10 times



The 3rd photo: I took the original photo, there is NO frame layer, and I resized the photo 8 times.

No Frame Layer - Resized 8 times



The 4th photo: I took the original photo, there is NO frame layer, and I resized the photo just 2 times. I resized it down to 50 pixels and back to the original 496 pixels. You can see the dramatic effect significant resizing has on photo quality.

No Frame Layer - Resized 2 times



The 5th photo: To show how an advanced photographer can use advanced photo processing techniques, you can see how I took an ordinary photograph and made it better:

Advanced Digital Editing Techniques

Here is an original photo that came out of my camera and here is another one using a circular polarizing filter, tripod and advanced digital editing techniques.  You be the judge of what you as a buyer would rather see:

Before...Straight out of the camera:


before - straight out of camera

 

or...After...using a circular polarizing filter, tripod, correct time of day, no overcast sky, and advanced digital editing techniques:

after

Now then...about that 1st showing...

close

Re-Bloggged 2 times:

Re-Blogged By Re-Blogged At
  1. Jose Dias 11/13/2010 11:51 PM
  2. Jim Frimmer 11/14/2010 03:20 AM
Spam prevention

Accessibility option: listen to a question and answer it!

To submit the form,
drag the clock to the circle on the side.

Type below the answer to what you hear. Numbers or words, lowercase:

Topic:
Home Selling
Groups:
Tips and Techniques for Better Real Estate Photography
ABC's of Real Estate Marketing
Advice for Sellers
Photography, Advanced
Photoshop Elements for Real Estate
Tags:
cleveland real estate photography

Comments 37 New Comment

Rainmaker
558,639
Chris Olsen
Broker Owner Cleveland Ohio Real Estate
Olsen Ziegler Realty

Hi Julia -- So true, DPI, minimum resolution sizes, etc.  I see luxury homes that are thumbnail sized in our MLS, totally unbelievable.

Hi Andrzej -- I haven't played much with RAW, but have read some articles on the tremendous flexibility it gives an advanced photographer, so thanks for the insight.

Hi Frank -- Thanks for your perspective on your MLS.  I have not heard of fines being levied.  I don't know exactly what the rules are, so I cannot comment specifically, but I don't see any difference at all when it comes to basic editing for things that could be done with more expensive equipment on the front end. For example: I could use a tripod to create clearer images, or I could shoot without a tripod and correct that (somewhat) in a editing program, to me, either way, you end up with relatively the same result, so what difference does it make?  But perhaps the rules are for more crazy stuff like removing things, changing backgrounds, etc.?

 

November 15, 2010 06:09 PM
Rainmaker
558,639
Chris Olsen
Broker Owner Cleveland Ohio Real Estate
Olsen Ziegler Realty

Hi Tammie -- Totally agree with you, you serve your sellers well! :)

Hi Kathy -- I'm learning everyday too -- it never ends.

Hi Gary -- You bring up such an important topic on lighting, you are so right, it makes a huge difference.

Hi Maureen -- Thanks...and I learn alot from reading about home staging from you as well.

Hi Scott -- Lots of options for moderate prices these days.

Hi Claude -- Oh so true...well said.

Hi Carla -- Thanks.

Hi Mike W. -- So said isn't it when you see that kind of stuff?

Hi Mike L. -- You bring up a good point, imagine if all the photos on every listing were above average or exceptional.

 

November 15, 2010 06:55 PM
Rainmaker
123,308
Iran Watson
Marietta Real Estate Agent - Photographer
Georgia Elite Realty

Lots of good info here Chris.  I can't tell you how many time I have toiled away in post to get a set perfect only to see the quality trashed by the lossy Jpeg conversion I have to do in order to upload the photos to the MLS.  After going back and forth several times uploading and deleting photos from my MLS, I created an action in PS that basically preps the images for the pixel wrangling it will inevitabely get when uploaded.  It's still a far cry from the majestic look of the original PSD file, but at least it addresses this in some manner.

November 22, 2010 10:20 PM
Rainmaker
558,639
Chris Olsen
Broker Owner Cleveland Ohio Real Estate
Olsen Ziegler Realty

Hi Iran -- Sounds like you have a good handle on it.  I use PE and I save it as a PSD until I'm done, then I lower the DPI to 72 at the same time I alter the final dimensions, then save it out as a JPG then don't touch it.  I'm not sure if I should be doing anything more, but that's my end of workflow.

November 23, 2010 07:10 PM
Rainmaker
87,633
Leslie Leis and Dee Bundy
Sell Smart, Buy Wise & Live Well in Nrthn Colorado
ERA Herman Group Real Estate

Thank you for this post. Someone needs to say it. I get so frustrated with all the agents that take 400k listings and only put 1 or 2 pictures on the MLS. Seriously I can't believe they can even get the listing by doing that!!!

December 07, 2010 12:04 AM
Rainmaker
558,639

Chris Olsen

Broker Owner Cleveland Ohio Real Estate
Ask me a question
*
*
*
Spam prevention

Accessibility option: listen to a question and answer it!

To submit the form,
drag the woman to the circle on the side.

Type below the answer to what you hear. Numbers or words, lowercase:

Additional Information