Would You Rather Have That House Rented OR Vacant?

By
Real Estate Appraiser with PahRoo Appraisal & Consultancy

As the Federal Government seriously takes on the task of dealing with the inventory of foreclosed properties in this country (and we here in the greater Chicago-land area made the unfortunate top 5 list of cities with significant federal concentration of foreclosed homes), it begs the question:

Would YOU rather have the house on your block (which the prior owner lost due to foreclosure) vacant or rented?  and why?

Michael Hobbs, PahRoo Appraisal & Consultancy

close

This entry hasn't been re-blogged:

Re-Blogged By Re-Blogged At
Topic:
ActiveRain Community
Location:
Illinois Cook County Chicago
Groups:
REO REALTORS
REO
Realtors®
Dedicated Bloggers
Addicted to Active Rain
Tags:
foreclosure
federal government

Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Spam prevention
Show All Comments
Ambassador
674,995
Karen Crowson
Alain Pinel Realtors, Pleasanton, CA - Livermore, CA
Livermore Wine Country Homes
Wow, hard call. It's often very tough to sell a house with tenants in it. I'd tather have neighbors, than a vacant house next door though.
Jan 13, 2012 11:44 PM #1
Rainmaker
39,929
Mike Liess
Remax Custom - Penfield, NY

Occupied properties rather than vacant. As long as the owner is not a slumlord and drives the neighborhood down with poorly screened tenants.

Jan 13, 2012 11:51 PM #2
Rainmaker
180,681
Michael Hobbs
PahRoo Appraisal & Consultancy - Chicago, IL
SRA, LEED GA, RAA

Karen, I completely agree.  Generally much easier to keep the house intact with it being occupied than with it being vacant.

Mike, of course!  that is definitely the risk.

Jan 15, 2012 09:18 PM #3
Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Show All Comments
Rainmaker
180,681

Michael Hobbs

SRA, LEED GA, RAA
Ask me a question
*
*
*
Spam prevention